Rubric

Find Rubric
Final PLC Meeting Report
Final PLC Meeting Report
Criteria Ratings Pts
Organization
threshold: pts
5 pts
The meeting was scheduled in a timely manner, all PLC members attended, and the meeting was run efficiently.
4 pts
The meeting was scheduled in a timely manner, all PLC members attended, and for the most part, the meeting was run efficiently.
3 pts
The meeting was scheduled in a timely manner, all PLC members attended, and some of the meeting was run efficiently.
2 pts
The meeting was not scheduled in a timely manner, all PLC members attended, and the meeting was not run efficiently.
0 pts
No Marks
pts
5 pts
--
Report on Unit of Study and Goals
threshold: pts
5 pts
Report on Unit of Study and Goals reflected meaningful thought and was grounded in course materials, readings, and personal insights. Topic was thoroughly addressed.
4 pts
Report reflected meaningful thought and was grounded in course materials, readings, and personal insights. Topic was thoroughly addressed.
3 pts
Some of the report reflected meaningful thought and was grounded in and personal insights. Topic was mentioned briefly.
2 pts
Report did not reflect meaningful thought and was only grounded in personal insights. Topic was not addressed.
0 pts
No Marks
pts
5 pts
--
Report on Assessments
threshold: pts
5 pts
Report on Assessments reflected meaningful thought and was grounded in course materials, readings, and personal insights. Topic was thoroughly addressed.
4 pts
Report reflected meaningful thought and was grounded in course materials, readings, and personal insights. Topic was thoroughly addressed.
3 pts
Some of the report reflected meaningful thought and was grounded in and personal insights. Topic was mentioned briefly.
2 pts
Report did not reflect meaningful thought and was only grounded in personal insights. Topic was not addressed.
0 pts
No Marks
pts
5 pts
--
Report on Management Plan
threshold: pts
5 pts
Report on Management Plan reflected meaningful thought and was grounded in course materials, readings, and personal insights. Topic was thoroughly addressed.
4 pts
Report reflected meaningful thought and was grounded in course materials, readings, and personal insights. Topic was thoroughly addressed.
3 pts
Some of the report reflected meaningful thought and was grounded in and personal insights. Topic was mentioned briefly.
2 pts
Report did not reflect meaningful thought and was only grounded in personal insights. Topic was not addressed.
0 pts
No Marks
pts
5 pts
--
Report on RTI Supports
threshold: pts
5 pts
Report on RTI Supports reflected meaningful thought and was grounded in course materials, readings, and personal insights. Topic was thoroughly addressed.
4 pts
Report reflected meaningful thought and was grounded in course materials, readings, and personal insights. Topic was thoroughly addressed.
3 pts
Some of the report reflected meaningful thought and was grounded in and personal insights. Topic was mentioned briefly.
2 pts
Report did not reflect meaningful thought and was only grounded in personal insights. Topic was not addressed.
0 pts
No Marks
pts
5 pts
--
Report on Brittany
threshold: pts
5 pts
Report on Brittany reflected meaningful thought and was grounded in course materials, readings, and personal insights. Topic was thoroughly addressed.
4 pts
Report reflected meaningful thought and was grounded in course materials, readings, and personal insights. Topic was thoroughly addressed.
3 pts
Some of the report reflected meaningful thought and was grounded in and personal insights. Topic was mentioned briefly.
2 pts
Report did not reflect meaningful thought and was only grounded in personal insights. Topic was not addressed.
0 pts
No Marks
pts
5 pts
--
Report on James
threshold: pts
5 pts
Report on James reflected meaningful thought and was grounded in course materials, readings, and personal insights. Topic was thoroughly addressed.
4 pts
Report reflected meaningful thought and was grounded in course materials, readings, and personal insights. Topic was thoroughly addressed.
3 pts
Some of the report reflected meaningful thought and was grounded in and personal insights. Topic was mentioned briefly.
2 pts
Report did not reflect meaningful thought and was only grounded in personal insights. Topic was not addressed.
0 pts
No Marks
pts
5 pts
--
Report on Shawn
threshold: pts
5 pts
Report on Shawn reflected meaningful thought and was grounded in course materials, readings, and personal insights. Topic was thoroughly addressed.
4 pts
Report reflected meaningful thought and was grounded in course materials, readings, and personal insights. Topic was thoroughly addressed.
3 pts
Some of the report reflected meaningful thought and was grounded in and personal insights. Topic was mentioned briefly.
2 pts
Report did not reflect meaningful thought and was only grounded in personal insights. Topic was not addressed.
0 pts
No Marks
pts
5 pts
--
Report on Isabel
threshold: pts
5 pts
Report on Isabel reflected meaningful thought and was grounded in course materials, readings, and personal insights. Topic was thoroughly addressed.
4 pts
Report reflected meaningful thought and was grounded in course materials, readings, and personal insights. Topic was thoroughly addressed.
3 pts
Some of the report reflected meaningful thought and was grounded in and personal insights. Topic was mentioned briefly.
2 pts
Report did not reflect meaningful thought and was only grounded in personal insights. Topic was not addressed.
0 pts
No Marks
pts
5 pts
--
Report on Future Goals
threshold: pts
5 pts
Report on Future Goals reflected meaningful thought and was grounded in course materials, readings, and personal insights. Topic was thoroughly addressed.
4 pts
Report reflected meaningful thought and was grounded in course materials, readings, and personal insights. Topic was thoroughly addressed.
3 pts
Some of the report reflected meaningful thought and was grounded in and personal insights. Topic was mentioned briefly.
2 pts
Report did not reflect meaningful thought and was only grounded in personal insights. Topic was not addressed.
0 pts
No Marks
pts
5 pts
--
Questions from professor were addressed appropriately
threshold: pts
5 pts
Responses were knowledgeable and consistently grounded in course readings as well as personal insights.
4 pts
For the most part, responses were knowledgeable and consistently grounded in course readings as well as personal insights.
3 pts
Some responses were knowledgeable and consistently grounded in course readings or personal insights.
2 pts
Most responses were not knowledgeable and were not consistently grounded in course readings or personal insights.
0 pts
No Marks
pts
5 pts
--
Time
threshold: pts
5 pts
Meeting lasted 20 to 25 minutes.
4 pts
Meeting lasted 15-19 minutes or 26-30 minutes.
3 pts
Meeting lasted 10-14 minutes or 31-35 minutes.
2 pts
Meeting lasted 5-9 minutes or 36-40 minutes.
0 pts
No Marks
pts
5 pts
--
Total Points: 60 out of 60