Rubric

Find Rubric
Keep in mind that 29 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.
Some Rubric (3)
Some Rubric (3)
Criteria Ratings Pts
Completion
threshold: pts
5 pts
All steps were completed correctly and the template is filled in entirely. All three areas of UDL are addressed and 5 or more specific UDL strategies are described in detail. Appropriate accommodations are included for all 4 case study students. Summaries of case study students include exceptional detail.
4 pts
Most of the steps were completed correctly and most sections of the template are complete. All three areas of UDL are addressed and 4 or more specific UDL strategies are described in detail. Appropriate accommodations are included for at least 3 case study students. Summaries of case study students include appropriate detail.
3 pts
Some steps were completed correctly and some sections of the template are complete. At least two areas of UDL are addressed and 3 or more specific UDL strategies are described in detail. Appropriate accommodations are included for at least 2 case study students. Summaries of case study students include some detail.
2 pts
Few steps were completed correctly and few sections of the template are complete. One area of UDL is addressed and 2 or more specific UDL strategies are described in detail. Appropriate accommodations are included for at least 1 case study student. Summaries of case study students are vague.
pts
5 pts
--
Appropriateness
threshold: pts
5 pts
UDL strategies that address representation, engagement, and expression are all appropriate for the age group and grade level described. Accommodations for each case study student address their specific needs. Summaries contain justification based on course readings and personal insight.
4 pts
Most of the UDL strategies that address representation, engagement, and expression are appropriate for the age group and grade level described. Accommodations for at least 3 case study student address their specific needs. Summaries contain justification based on course readings and personal insight.
3 pts
UDL strategies address representation, engagement, or expression and some are appropriate for the age group and grade level described. Accommodations for at least 2 case study student address their specific needs. Summaries contain justification based on course readings or personal insight.
2 pts
UDL strategies only address one area of UDL and few are appropriate for the age group and grade level described. Accommodations for only one case study student address their specific needs. Summaries are vague.
pts
5 pts
--
Alignment
threshold: pts
5 pts
The lesson objective is aligned to a specific core standard from the Utah Core Curriculum and the unit learning goal. All the UDL strategies are tied specifically to the lesson objective. The summaries discuss in exceptional detail how they are aligned.
4 pts
The lesson objective is aligned to a specific core standard from the Utah Core Curriculum and the unit learning goal. Most of the UDL strategies are tied specifically to the lesson objective. The summaries discuss in appropriate detail how they are aligned.
3 pts
The lesson objective is aligned to the unit learning goal. Some of the UDL strategies are tied specifically to the lesson objective. The summaries discuss in detail how they are aligned.
2 pts
The lesson objective not aligned to a specific core standard from the Utah Core Curriculum or the unit learning goal. The UDL strategies not are tied specifically to the lesson objective. The summaries are vague on how they are aligned.
pts
5 pts
--
Quality of response
threshold: pts
5 pts
All elements included in the template were completed with meaningful thought. Summaries were grounded in course materials, readings, and personal insights.
4 pts
The majority elements included in the template were completed with meaningful thought. Summaries were grounded in course materials, readings, and personal insights.
3 pts
Some elements included in the template were completed with meaningful thought. Summaries were based only on personal insights.
2 pts
Elements included in the template were not completed with meaningful thought. Summaries were vague and unsupported.
pts
5 pts
--
Total Points: 20 out of 20